![]() |
![]() |
b m j e dl o n d o nw c 1 n 3 x x |
|
More Trouble in the Balkans The Kosovo war was
also an information war that was led surprisingly successful considering how many
'facts' had to be made up or twisted. Let's once again reiterate: In the Yugoslav
province of Kosovo there had been an armed insurrection of a nationalist group
called the UCK (in the US and UK usually referred to as KLA) with the aim of secession
from the FRY (Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) and possibly/ultimately the creation
of a Greater Albania. The UCK was supported by the German secret service BND (Bundesnachrichtendienst)
and otherwise financed by "taxes" levied from the Albanian diaspora
and by selling Heroin in Europe (already at the end of 1999 Hashim Thacis gang
controlled 40% of the European heroin, according to German Unmik police). When
the banking system in Albania itself collapsed in 1997 there were widespread riots
and looting and an actual breakdown of the state; one result was easy access to
weapons which were smuggled into Kosovo. As the fighting got more intense, uglier
things started happening: Serb paramilitaries killed 67 Kosovo Albanians in March
'98 as a revenge action for example, after more and more police stations had become
target of UCK attacks, and the civil war started making headlines in the Western
media. Until summer 1998 there was debate of a Nato intervention to close
the border between Albania and Kosovo in order to stabilise the region. The
Germans vetoed this, having followed a policy of reshaping south eastern Europe
along ethnic lines. The propaganda machinery started working towards war. A UN
mandate was not sought - it wouldn't have been obtainable. As fighting spread
in Kosovo, often villages were evacuated during the shelling, mostly it appears
the inhabitants were able to return, often to find houses burning as a consequence
of fighting. There is no doubt that every civilian population will dearly suffer
from any armed conflict, that destruction will create refugees. But the Nato propaganda
painted a picture of a systematic ethnic cleansing campaign by the Serbs, the
Germans even spoke of Genocide. There was talk of concentration camps in Pristina
and of massacres like the one in Racak. These were the two main "proofs".
The problem is that there was no concentration camp in Pristina and there was
no massacre in Racak (the dead turned out to be UCK fighters). Two years after the Nato bombing raids on Serbia the situation on the Balkans is everything but calm. We tried to present a run-down of what had happened in the last issue of datacide, here I will limit myself to a few crucial points that can be made with a bit more distance. 1. There are people considering themselves to be on the 'Left'
who supported the NATO strikes, and believed the UCK was worth supporting because
they believe in the 'duty' of lefties to support 'national liberation'. They indeed
followed the 'centre-left' governments that made it possible that the crudest
imperialism could rage in Europe, without even double-checking what was on whose
agenda, and who the UCK even were. Rational arguments for this position are scarce,
they are based on invented figures of victims of Serb ethnic cleansing, and characterised
by denial of any actual information that has surfaced since then. For example
the practice of the UCK since it was allowed to put into action its concept of
freedom: Free Kosovo of Serbs, Roma and Jews. 2. Another minority actually did defend the Milosevic regime
with the reasoning that it was the last "Socialist" state in Europe
and that practically all crimes against humanity had been invented. While the
latter is maybe close to the truth, the former claim - that the Federal Republic
of Yugoslavia is "socialist" is rather ridiculous, unless you think
that for example wage differences of up to 1000 times in the same factories between
workers and managers are a good example of "Socialism". 3. The downfall of Milosevic is nevertheless another little
step in the realisation of the new European order as invisaged by - mainly - the
Germans. The new president Kostunica is politically an even more hardline nationalist
than Milosevic, but what counts is that he is economically willing to push through
neoliberal reforms, and waiting in the wings are those eager to collaborate with
the West at any cost. Hardly a 'revolution'. This neo-liberal-nationalist "opposition"
was bankrolled by the West rather generously, and besides that the question remains
how free these elections were considering that every voter knew that voting for
Milosevic meant to prolong unbearable sanctions - the will to survive alone was
enough to make them vote for Kostunica (who managed to gain credibility thanks
to his anti-western rhetoric). 4. One aspect we may have
underestimated a bit (in last issue's article) is the geopolitical aspect of the
control of the raw materials and pipelines, in that the planned and executed systematic
destruction of Yugoslavia has to do with the pushing back of the Russian influence
in the Balkans, as Germany is trying to create an economic lebensraum for its
industry in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The quest for control of access
and transport routes for the supposedly massive oil reserves in the Caspic
Sea area plays a role in the Balcans too: One of the two projected (Europe-bound)
pipelines is supposed to go through Bulgaria, Macedonia and Albania, the other
through Rumania, Serbia and Croatia. Needless to say the European powers are extremely
interested to be in charge in these areas, to have troops stationed in the region
certainly aids that purpose. 5. One of the other important aspects of the Kosovo war, re-affirming
NATO unity under US leadership, may actually have suffered a blow by the "election"
of George W. Bush jr. While it's true that there is little difference in the policies
of Democrats and Republicans, there are still different views as to how capitalism
is supposed to be enforced and managed. While waving the phony flag of "compassionate
Conservatism", Bush's record in Texas speaks another language: Serial judicial
murder and mass incarceration. His nomination of John Ashcroft for the Attorney
General made clear that he is intent to extend extreme reactionary positions over
the country. Ashcroft is an old school rabid racist and has opposed prosecution
of terrorists who attack abortion clinics. 6. Germany may turn out to be the main winner of the Kosovo
War: They are allowed to bomb other countries again and station troops there,
and a Europe under their leadership is becoming a bit more probable. Already they
didn't hesitate to demand more votes than France at the summit in Nice which shocked
those who thought the constellation of the French-German partnership was invariable. 7. One of the important ingredients for keeping the population
'pro-war' once the carnage had started was that there were no dead soldiers being
sent back in body bags. Of course some were keen to send in the ground troops,
but wisely abstained from doing so. However the war always comes home: Tons of
Uranium hardened anti-tank ammunition was and still is scattered around the territory
of ex-Yugoslavia, including Bosnia, Kosovo, and of course Serbia. And is radiating
friend and foe. After the death from leukemia of six Italian soldiers, considerable
nervousness has set in Europe, and only the US MoD is categorically denying a
connection between the uranium and the increased illnesses. A Belgrade ecologist
is speaking of cancer rates in Serbia being up 30%, but hey it's only the beginning.
After all people in Cambodia and Laos are still getting blown up by American bombs
and mines that are scattered all over the place, and Vietnamese women still give
birth to monsters thanks to the makers of Agent Orange, the company now known
as Monsanto for its leading role in GM research and marketing. Uranium hardened
ammo wasn't used in Indochina yet, the premiere of this innovative technique of
puncturing steel plates was in Iraq where 315 t were distributed by firing 94'400
projectiles. |
| b m j e dl o n d o nw c 1 n 3 x x | ![]() |